Effectiveness of a Planned Teaching Programme on Knowledge Regarding Farmer’s Lung and Its Prevention Among Farmers in Rural Odisha, India: A Pre-Experimental Study

Authors

  • Mr. PURANDAR SAHU M.Sc.NURSING Author

Keywords:

farmer’s lung; hypersensitivity pneumonitis; farmers; occupational health; organic dust; health education; respiratory health; rural India; knowledge; community health nursing

Abstract

Background

Agricultural workers are routinely exposed to organic dust, moulds, fungi, microbial bioaerosols, and other respiratory hazards. Farmer’s lung is an occupational form of hypersensitivity pneumonitis associated with repeated inhalation of antigenic material from mouldy hay, grain, and other agricultural products. Although exposure reduction is central to prevention, awareness of occupational respiratory hazards among farming communities may be limited. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a structured planned teaching programme on knowledge regarding farmer’s lung and its prevention among farmers in rural Odisha, India.

Methods

An evaluative, one-group pretest–post-test study was conducted among 100 farmers from Madhiapali Village, Balangir District, Odisha, India, from October 7 to October 27, 2024. Participants were selected using systematic random sampling. Baseline demographic characteristics and knowledge regarding farmer’s lung were assessed using a structured 30-item knowledge questionnaire. A planned teaching programme covering disease concepts, occupational exposure, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, prevention, and basic management was subsequently delivered. A post-test was conducted on the eighth day. Descriptive statistics, paired t-test, and chi-square test were used for analysis.

Results

At baseline, 86 participants (86.0%) had inadequate knowledge and 14 (14.0%) had moderate knowledge; none had adequate knowledge. The mean pretest knowledge score was 11.54 ± 3.97 out of 30 (38.4%). Following the intervention, the mean score increased to 18.60 ± 5.24 (62.0%), representing a mean gain of 7.06 points. The difference between pretest and post-test scores was statistically significant (paired t = 20.21, p < 0.001). At post-test, 28 participants (28.0%) had inadequate knowledge, 56 (56.0%) had moderate knowledge, and 16 (16.0%) had adequate knowledge. Baseline knowledge was significantly associated with educational qualification and monthly income.

Conclusion

The planned teaching programme was associated with a significant improvement in knowledge regarding farmer’s lung and its prevention. Community-based occupational respiratory health education may be a feasible component of preventive health services for farming populations. However, controlled studies with larger samples and longer follow-up are required to determine whether improvements in knowledge translate into sustained exposure-reduction practices and improved respiratory health.

121 134

References

References:-

1. Poole JA, Zamora-Sifuentes JL, De Las Vecillas L, Quirce S. Respiratory diseases associated with organic dust exposure. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2024;12(8):1960-71. doi:10.1016/j.jaip.2024.02.022.

2. O'Brien C, Kingston L, Plant BJ, Coffey A. Lung health in farming: a scoping review. J Agromedicine. 2023;28(3):335-45. doi:10.1080/1059924X.2023.2178573.

3. Raghu G, Remy-Jardin M, Ryerson CJ, Myers JL, Kreuter M, Vasakova M, et al. Diagnosis of hypersensitivity pneumonitis in adults: an official ATS/JRS/ALAT clinical practice guideline. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020;202(3):e36-69. doi:10.1164/rccm.202005-2032ST.

4. Hamblin M, Prosch H, Vasakova M. Diagnosis, course and management of hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Eur Respir Rev. 2022;31(163):210169. doi:10.1183/16000617.0169-2021.

5. Barnes H, Troy L, Lee CT, Sperling A, Strek M, Glaspole I. Hypersensitivity pneumonitis: current concepts in pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment. Allergy. 2022;77(2):442-53. doi:10.1111/all.15017.

6. Fernandez Perez ER, Travis WD, Lynch DA, Brown KK, Johannson KA, Selman M, et al. Diagnosis and evaluation of hypersensitivity pneumonitis: CHEST guideline and expert panel report. Chest. 2021;160(2):e97-156. doi:10.1016/j.chest.2021.03.066.

7. Quirce S, Vandenplas O, Campo P, Cruz MJ, de Blay F, Koschel D, et al. Occupational hypersensitivity pneumonitis: an EAACI position paper. Allergy. 2016;71(6):765-79. doi:10.1111/all.12866.

8. Koster MA. Hypersensitivity pneumonitis: an updated diagnostic guide for internists. Med Clin North Am. 2022;106(6):1055-65. doi:10.1016/j.mcna.2022.08.007.

9. Barnes H, Corte TJ, Keir G, Khor YH, Limaye S, Wrobel JP, et al. Diagnosis and management of hypersensitivity pneumonitis in adults: a position statement from the Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand. Respirology. 2024;29(12):1023-46. doi:10.1111/resp.14847.

10. Koschel D, Behr J, Berger M, Bonella F, Hamer O, Joest M, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of hypersensitivity pneumonitis: S2k guideline of the German Respiratory Society and the German Society for Allergology and Clinical Immunology. Pneumologie. 2024;78(12):963-1002. doi:10.1055/a-2369-8458.

11. Vašáková M, Morell F, Walsh S, Leslie KO, Raghu G. Hypersensitivity pneumonitis: perspectives in diagnosis and management. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;196(6):680-9. doi:10.1164/rccm.201611-2201PP.

12. Koster MA, Thomson CC, Collins BF, Jenkins AR, Ruminjo JK, Raghu G. Diagnosis of hypersensitivity pneumonitis in adults, 2020 clinical practice guideline: summary for clinicians. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2021;18(4):559-66. doi:10.1513/AnnalsATS.202009-1195CME.

13. Yang SR, Beasley MB, Churg A, Colby TV, Fernandez Perez ER, Lynch D, et al. Diagnosis of hypersensitivity pneumonitis: review and summary of American College of Chest Physicians statement. Am J Surg Pathol. 2022;46(4):e71-93. doi:10.1097/PAS.0000000000001827.

14. Marinescu DC, Raghu G, Remy-Jardin M, Travis WD, Adegunsoye A, Beasley MB, et al. Integration and application of clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Chest. 2022;162(3):614-29. doi:10.1016/j.chest.2022.06.013.

15. Richeldi L, Varone F, Bergna M, de Andrade J, Falk J, Hallowell RW, et al. Pharmacological management of hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2022;28(5):464-70.

16. Ashuro Z, Debela BG, Daba C, Hareru HE, Abaya SW, Byrne AL. The effect of occupational exposure to organic dust on lung function parameters among African industrial workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Public Health. 2024;12:1424315. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1424315.

17. Walters GI, Huntley CC. Novel occupational causes of hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2023;23(2):85-91. doi:10.1097/ACI.0000000000000894.

Downloads

Published

17-09-2026

How to Cite

Effectiveness of a Planned Teaching Programme on Knowledge Regarding Farmer’s Lung and Its Prevention Among Farmers in Rural Odisha, India: A Pre-Experimental Study. (2026). Ekansh Journal of Nursing, Public Health and Medical Science, 1(1), 1-7. https://ejnph.org/index.php/dnes/article/view/7